Say ebat nen Corona ed impeachment complaint

Diad samay ebat nen Corona, wala iray abistaan ko ran lingo. Ipapanengneg to ya pinekewet daray abogado nen Corona say sakey ya artikulo.

Saya so insulat kod sakey ya palapagan bilang kominto:

Kindly read the soon-to-be-published article by Laarni Escresa and Nuno Garoupa as cited in the Corona answer to the impeachment complaint. It seems that Corona lawyers did not read the proviso that it cannot be cited nor quoted. More grievous is the fact that they maliciously used the authors to support their claim that in no way was Corona partial to GMA when in reality table 2 of the study, Corona registered 14 pro-GMA votes and 5 anti-GMA or 74 % pro-administration, NOT 8 pro-GMA votes and 28 anti-GMA votes or 29 % pro-administration as given in the answer. On the other hand, Carpio registered 11 pro-GMA votes and 9 anti-GMA votes or 55 %  pro-administration, NOT 19 pro-GMA votes and 11 anti-GMA votes or 66 % pro-administration as alleged in the Corona rebuttal. Brion had a 100 % pro-GMA votes as he casted 2 votes and 0 vote anti-GMA, which is in full contrast to the Corona reply that Brion had 5 pro-GMA votes and 8 anti-GMA votes or 33% pro-administration. Authors also conclude that, my apologies to the authors, "Perhaps aware of the crucial role by the Supreme Court and the Chief Justice, she [GMA] appointed individuals within her circle of influence. She appointed three chief justices and ignored the tradition of appointing the most senior twice. She bypassed Puno over Panganiban in 2005 and bypassed Carpio over Corona in 2010." You can download this at http://www.law.illinois.edu/_shared/pdfs/Philippineproject20101110.pdf.